70 lines
2.7 KiB
Text
70 lines
2.7 KiB
Text
|
Desc: Issues and direction for the megatec driver
|
||
|
|
File: megatec.txt
|
||
|
|
Date: 29 March 2006
|
||
|
|
Auth: Carlos Rodrigues <carlos.efr@mail.telepac.pt>
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Overall concept
|
||
|
|
===============
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The "powermust" driver was originally developed to support the Mustek Powermust
|
||
|
|
series of UPSes, but since there are some other drivers implementing (mostly)
|
||
|
|
the same protocol, an idea came up to unify all these other drivers under a
|
||
|
|
renamed version of "powermust": "megatec".
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The idea is to support all the hardware previously supported by the other
|
||
|
|
drivers with a minimum number of special cases. Most of the time this isn't
|
||
|
|
difficult, as the protocol states that all unknown/unimplemented commands
|
||
|
|
should be ignored (the commands are simply echoed back).
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Target drivers
|
||
|
|
==============
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The following drivers are targeted for "assimilation":
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
* blazer (1)
|
||
|
|
* fentonups (1)
|
||
|
|
* mustek (1)
|
||
|
|
* esupssmart (1)
|
||
|
|
* ippon (1)
|
||
|
|
* sms (1)
|
||
|
|
* masterguard (3)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
(1) megatec already supercedes this driver in functionality.
|
||
|
|
(2) megatec partially supercedes this driver in functionality, but some
|
||
|
|
small features are missing (non-critical for normal operation).
|
||
|
|
(3) megatec partially supercedes this driver in functionality, but some
|
||
|
|
important features are missing, which means some hardware may not be
|
||
|
|
supported.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The above status is infered from some testing and from looking at the code
|
||
|
|
of the drivers. Although I have a high degree of certainty about it, more
|
||
|
|
testing is needed/welcome.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Notes
|
||
|
|
=====
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The "masterguard" driver seems to be the most problematic: it implements a
|
||
|
|
"Q3" command (similar to "Q1" but with extra information), and the command
|
||
|
|
to get information from the UPS is "WH" instead of "I" (with a different
|
||
|
|
response also).
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
All drivers cancel the battery tests with "CT". The protocol seems to imply
|
||
|
|
that the 10 second battery test can't be cancelled (which makes sense).
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The beeper can be toggled with "Q", but there doesn't seem to exist a way to
|
||
|
|
check if it is on or off, which may confuse users when a "beeper.on" command
|
||
|
|
actually turns it off and vice-versa (maybe some models default to "on", and
|
||
|
|
others to "off", this may make this command fit better as a blind
|
||
|
|
"beeper.toggle").
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The "sms" driver implements a simple watchdog (send and "SxxRxxx" command to
|
||
|
|
power cycle the UPS every time the "reset.watchdog" command is called).
|
||
|
|
There are two battery tests: failure ("T" - 10sec?) and until LOWBATT ("TL").
|
||
|
|
Moreover, there are some "S.3" or "S.3R0003" commands which fly in the face
|
||
|
|
of "S05R0003" which the driver also issues (this last one matches all the
|
||
|
|
other drivers, the first two seem to imply that the UPS also accepts those
|
||
|
|
format variations to the standard "SxxRxxxx" shutdown+return commands).
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
--
|
||
|
|
Carlos Rodrigues
|