Power cycle force-stopped and started a template, which power on refuses.
A non-staff owner with is_delete could delete a template that the
template rule otherwise leaves to superusers and staff owners;
get_instance(perm_type="delete") now refuses it, and the page offers
Destroy by the same rule.
The documented rule held only for snapshots: an owner with is_change could
still resize a template, set its root password and SSH keys, change its
options and console settings. get_instance(perm_type="change") now
refuses a template to owners who are not staff, which covers every change
view and the API; the per-view snapshot checks it replaces are removed,
and the page offers those controls by the same rule. Viewing, the console,
power (a no-op on a template) and cloning are unchanged.
The page showed controls the backend then refused: power to global
viewers, the console, virt-viewer and VDI controls and the root password
and SSH key forms to viewers, resize to staff, per-vCPU hotplug, video
model and guest agent to non-superusers, clone and options by the clone
permission alone, snapshots without change permission. The page now asks
the views' own rules (owner, is_change, clone and snapshot permissions,
the template rules). OS info, opened from the header, is there for every
viewer; the XML editor and tab restoring after a redirect no longer throw
when a pane is absent; Settings opens on the first section the user has.
The authorization matrix also covers a template VM, the template clone
rule and the template snapshot rule.
