j3d1/webvirtcloud
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/retspen/webvirtcloud synced 2025-07-31 12:41:08 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Initial commit

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Retspen 2015-02-27 10:53:51 +02:00
commit 4d48e79341
87 changed files with 5637 additions and 0 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

226
vrtManager/rwlock.py Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,226 @@
# -*- coding: iso-8859-15 -*-
"""locks.py - Read-Write lock thread lock implementation
See the class documentation for more info.
Copyright (C) 2007, Heiko Wundram.
Released under the BSD-license.
found at: http://code.activestate.com/recipes/502283-read-write-lock-class-rlock-like/
"""
# Imports
# -------
from threading import Condition, Lock, currentThread
from time import time
# Read write lock
# ---------------
class ReadWriteLock(object):
"""Read-Write lock class. A read-write lock differs from a standard
threading.RLock() by allowing multiple threads to simultaneously hold a
read lock, while allowing only a single thread to hold a write lock at the
same point of time.
When a read lock is requested while a write lock is held, the reader
is blocked; when a write lock is requested while another write lock is
held or there are read locks, the writer is blocked.
Writers are always preferred by this implementation: if there are blocked
threads waiting for a write lock, current readers may request more read
locks (which they eventually should free, as they starve the waiting
writers otherwise), but a new thread requesting a read lock will not
be granted one, and block. This might mean starvation for readers if
two writer threads interweave their calls to acquireWrite() without
leaving a window only for readers.
In case a current reader requests a write lock, this can and will be
satisfied without giving up the read locks first, but, only one thread
may perform this kind of lock upgrade, as a deadlock would otherwise
occur. After the write lock has been granted, the thread will hold a
full write lock, and not be downgraded after the upgrading call to
acquireWrite() has been match by a corresponding release().
"""
def __init__(self):
"""Initialize this read-write lock."""
# Condition variable, used to signal waiters of a change in object
# state.
self.__condition = Condition(Lock())
# Initialize with no writers.
self.__writer = None
self.__upgradewritercount = 0
self.__pendingwriters = []
# Initialize with no readers.
self.__readers = {}
def acquireRead(self, timeout=None):
"""Acquire a read lock for the current thread, waiting at most
timeout seconds or doing a non-blocking check in case timeout is <= 0.
In case timeout is None, the call to acquireRead blocks until the
lock request can be serviced.
In case the timeout expires before the lock could be serviced, a
RuntimeError is thrown."""
if timeout is not None:
endtime = time() + timeout
me = currentThread()
self.__condition.acquire()
try:
if self.__writer is me:
# If we are the writer, grant a new read lock, always.
self.__writercount += 1
return
while True:
if self.__writer is None:
# Only test anything if there is no current writer.
if self.__upgradewritercount or self.__pendingwriters:
if me in self.__readers:
# Only grant a read lock if we already have one
# in case writers are waiting for their turn.
# This means that writers can't easily get starved
# (but see below, readers can).
self.__readers[me] += 1
return
# No, we aren't a reader (yet), wait for our turn.
else:
# Grant a new read lock, always, in case there are
# no pending writers (and no writer).
self.__readers[me] = self.__readers.get(me, 0) + 1
return
if timeout is not None:
remaining = endtime - time()
if remaining <= 0:
# Timeout has expired, signal caller of this.
raise RuntimeError("Acquiring read lock timed out")
self.__condition.wait(remaining)
else:
self.__condition.wait()
finally:
self.__condition.release()
def acquireWrite(self, timeout=None):
"""Acquire a write lock for the current thread, waiting at most
timeout seconds or doing a non-blocking check in case timeout is <= 0.
In case the write lock cannot be serviced due to the deadlock
condition mentioned above, a ValueError is raised.
In case timeout is None, the call to acquireWrite blocks until the
lock request can be serviced.
In case the timeout expires before the lock could be serviced, a
RuntimeError is thrown."""
if timeout is not None:
endtime = time() + timeout
me, upgradewriter = currentThread(), False
self.__condition.acquire()
try:
if self.__writer is me:
# If we are the writer, grant a new write lock, always.
self.__writercount += 1
return
elif me in self.__readers:
# If we are a reader, no need to add us to pendingwriters,
# we get the upgradewriter slot.
if self.__upgradewritercount:
# If we are a reader and want to upgrade, and someone
# else also wants to upgrade, there is no way we can do
# this except if one of us releases all his read locks.
# Signal this to user.
raise ValueError(
"Inevitable dead lock, denying write lock"
)
upgradewriter = True
self.__upgradewritercount = self.__readers.pop(me)
else:
# We aren't a reader, so add us to the pending writers queue
# for synchronization with the readers.
self.__pendingwriters.append(me)
while True:
if not self.__readers and self.__writer is None:
# Only test anything if there are no readers and writers.
if self.__upgradewritercount:
if upgradewriter:
# There is a writer to upgrade, and it's us. Take
# the write lock.
self.__writer = me
self.__writercount = self.__upgradewritercount + 1
self.__upgradewritercount = 0
return
# There is a writer to upgrade, but it's not us.
# Always leave the upgrade writer the advance slot,
# because he presumes he'll get a write lock directly
# from a previously held read lock.
elif self.__pendingwriters[0] is me:
# If there are no readers and writers, it's always
# fine for us to take the writer slot, removing us
# from the pending writers queue.
# This might mean starvation for readers, though.
self.__writer = me
self.__writercount = 1
self.__pendingwriters = self.__pendingwriters[1:]
return
if timeout is not None:
remaining = endtime - time()
if remaining <= 0:
# Timeout has expired, signal caller of this.
if upgradewriter:
# Put us back on the reader queue. No need to
# signal anyone of this change, because no other
# writer could've taken our spot before we got
# here (because of remaining readers), as the test
# for proper conditions is at the start of the
# loop, not at the end.
self.__readers[me] = self.__upgradewritercount
self.__upgradewritercount = 0
else:
# We were a simple pending writer, just remove us
# from the FIFO list.
self.__pendingwriters.remove(me)
raise RuntimeError("Acquiring write lock timed out")
self.__condition.wait(remaining)
else:
self.__condition.wait()
finally:
self.__condition.release()
def release(self):
"""Release the currently held lock.
In case the current thread holds no lock, a ValueError is thrown."""
me = currentThread()
self.__condition.acquire()
try:
if self.__writer is me:
# We are the writer, take one nesting depth away.
self.__writercount -= 1
if not self.__writercount:
# No more write locks; take our writer position away and
# notify waiters of the new circumstances.
self.__writer = None
self.__condition.notifyAll()
elif me in self.__readers:
# We are a reader currently, take one nesting depth away.
self.__readers[me] -= 1
if not self.__readers[me]:
# No more read locks, take our reader position away.
del self.__readers[me]
if not self.__readers:
# No more readers, notify waiters of the new
# circumstances.
self.__condition.notifyAll()
else:
raise ValueError("Trying to release unheld lock")
finally:
self.__condition.release()