Just ignore wrong ADD_NODEs instead of replying with a DEL_NODE, in the

hope other DEL_NODEs will catch up eventually.
This commit is contained in:
Guus Sliepen 2002-09-04 08:48:03 +00:00
parent 2af0bcc8fd
commit 973530db62

View file

@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
$Id: protocol_node.c,v 1.1.4.5 2002/09/04 08:33:08 guus Exp $
$Id: protocol_node.c,v 1.1.4.6 2002/09/04 08:48:03 guus Exp $
*/
#include "config.h"
@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ cp
if(prevhop == myself)
{
syslog(LOG_WARNING, _("Got ADD_NODE %s prevhop %s via %s from %s, sending back a DEL_NODE!"), name, prevhopname, vianame, c->name);
send_del_node(c, n);
// send_del_node(c, n);
return 0;
}
n->status.reachable = 1;
@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ cp
if(prevhop == myself)
{
syslog(LOG_WARNING, _("Got ADD_NODE %s prevhop %s via %s from %s!"), name, prevhopname, vianame, c->name);
send_del_node(c, n);
// send_del_node(c, n);
return 0;
}
node = avl_unlink(node_udp_tree, n);
@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ cp
/* If we got a DEL_NODE but we know of a different route to it, tell the one who send the DEL_NODE */
if(n->nexthop != c->node || n->prevhop != prevhop)
if(n->nexthop != c->node)
{
return send_add_node(c, n);
}