Described problem in more detail.

This commit is contained in:
Guus Sliepen 2001-07-22 14:46:11 +00:00
parent c1a98cd37e
commit 71b9041f48

View file

@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ maintain a stable network.
provided that the entire resulting derived work is distributed
under the terms of a permission notice identical to this one.
$Id: CONNECTIVITY,v 1.1.2.1 2001/07/22 14:04:38 guus Exp $
$Id: CONNECTIVITY,v 1.1.2.2 2001/07/22 14:46:11 guus Exp $
1. Problem
==========
@ -45,3 +45,96 @@ to C, both at the same time. The following loop will occur:
The situation described here is totally symmetric, there is no preference to
one connection over the other. The problem of resolving the loop, maintaining
consistency and stability is therefore not a trivial one.
What happens when A---D and C---F are connected to eachother? They exchange
lists of known hosts. A knows of B and C, and D knows of E and F. The protocol
defines ADD_HOST messages, from now on we will say that "node X sends and
ADD_HOST(Y) to Z".
There are two possible scenarios: either both A---D and C---F finish
authentication at the same time, or A---D finishes first, so that ADD_HOST
messages will reach C and F before they finish authentication.
1.1 A---D finishes first
------------------------
After A---D authentication finishes the following actions are taken:
1 A sends ADD_HOST(B) to D
A sends ADD_HOST(C) to D
D sends ADD_HOST(E) to A
D sends ADD_HOST(F) to A
2 A receives ADD_HOST(E) from D:
A sends ADD_HOST(E) to B
A receives ADD_HOST(F) from D:
A sends ADD_HOST(F) to B
D receives ADD_HOST(B) from A:
D sends ADD_HOST(B) to E
D receives ADD_HOST(C) from A:
D sends ADD_HOST(C) to E
3 B receives ADD_HOST(E) from A:
B sends ADD_HOST(E) to C
B receives ADD_HOST(F) from A:
B sends ADD_HOST(F) to C
E receives ADD_HOST(B) from D:
E sends ADD_HOST(B) to F
E receives ADD_HOST(C) from D:
E sends ADD_HOST(C) to F
4 C receives ADD_HOST(E) from B.
C receives ADD_HOST(F) from B.
F receives ADD_HOST(B) from E.
F receives ADD_HOST(C) from E.
Then C---F authentication finishes, the following actions are taken:
1 C notes that F is already known:
Connection is closed.
F notes that C is already known:
Connection is closed.
1.2 Both A---D and C---F finish at the same time.
-------------------------------------------------
1 A sends ADD_HOST(B) to D
A sends ADD_HOST(C) to D
D sends ADD_HOST(E) to A
D sends ADD_HOST(F) to A
C sends ADD_HOST(A) to F
C sends ADD_HOST(B) to F
F sends ADD_HOST(D) to C
F sends ADD_HOST(E) to C
2 A receives ADD_HOST(E) from D:
A sends ADD_HOST(E) to B
A receives ADD_HOST(F) from D:
A sends ADD_HOST(F) to B
D receives ADD_HOST(B) from A:
D sends ADD_HOST(B) to E
D receives ADD_HOST(C) from A:
D sends ADD_HOST(C) to E
C receives ADD_HOST(D) from F:
A sends ADD_HOST(D) to B
C receives ADD_HOST(E) from F:
A sends ADD_HOST(E) to B
F receives ADD_HOST(A) from C:
D sends ADD_HOST(A) to E
F receives ADD_HOST(B) from C:
D sends ADD_HOST(B) to E
3 B receives ADD_HOST(E) from A:
B sends ADD_HOST(E) to C
B receives ADD_HOST(F) from A:
B sends ADD_HOST(F) to C
E receives ADD_HOST(A) from D:
E sends ADD_HOST(A) to F
E receives ADD_HOST(B) from D:
E sends ADD_HOST(B) to F
B receives ADD_HOST(E) from C, and notes that is is already known:
<insert solution here>